If I were able to transport myself back in time to the 1700's, I would be in big trouble. Reason being, because I am African-American I would be a slave. Fortunately, I wouldn't be picking cotton, because of my skin tone, but I would most likely work in the kitchen, or in the house. So life would definitely change for me, but not for better. I wouldn't be able to choose what I wore, what I said, who my master was, or who I married. Not to mention I definitely wouldn't be able to decide to keep my children. They would be sold off as slaves, at a very young age. For these numerous reasons, I choose to stay in the 21st century.
Answer:
They traded with one another.
Explanation:
Arabian nomads dominated agriculture and animal husbandry well. This allowed a strong trade between them and the Arabs of the medieval Arab city, who offered, in exchange for agricultural products, other products such as fabrics, gold, jewelry and other things.
These two groups managed to establish a type of trade between them, where both were favored in some way and contributed to the survival of the two populations.
The main cause of the breakup of extended families in the Middle East is "<span>b. poverty". In general, families will send children to live with people who can afford to raise them if possible.</span>
Answer: IF the U.S did not trade with other countries our clothes wouldn't have even been made out of cloth, our furniture quality wouldn't be that good (most furniture that is good quality says MADE IN CHINA and not MADE IN U.S). Most of the cars we ride today we probably
would not have because most cars are also made in China.
Explanation:
The president nominates Supreme Court justices, but the <u>Senate </u>body must approve them.
<h3> Why does this often cause such a dramatic fight?</h3>
This cause such a dramatic fight because the person that was selected by the president may not be liked by some or majority of the senate. Some may like and some may not and this leads to disagreement.
<h3>Which body must approve the nomination for justices?</h3>
The president is known to be the person that has the power to nominate the justices and in terms of their appointments. they are known to be made with the advice and consent of the house of Senate.
Therefore, Since, The president nominates Supreme Court justices, but the <u>Senate </u>body must approve them. This cause such a dramatic fight because the person that was selected by the president may not be liked by some or majority of the senate. Some may like and some may not and this leads to disagreement.
Learn more about Supreme Court justices from
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
