<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The wolves
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
There were small rabbits that lived in the park near the wolves. However, the wolves never liked the lifestyle of the rabbits. This is because the wolves were not comfortable with their lives, but it was the only way that they would live. On particular nights many wolves were killed through lightening. However, they still blamed the rabbits for causing their death. On another night the wolves were killed by an earthquake, and they always blamed the rabbits. It was during this time that the wolves started conflicts with rabbits.
It is "both of the above"
amosc:Ladyyneek
I think its option D. the sense of sound to emphasize the intense volume of the storm.<span>
</span>
Answer:
Nadia Arumugam will completely agree with this cartoon because she clearly stated that 'no one is completely banned from taking unlimited amounts of soda since they are not restricted from ordering two or more bottles of soda if they so desire'.
Explanation:
In the cartoon the picture of a man drinking a giant-sized soda before the ban, was compared to him after the ban buying two cans of soda. There was clearly no difference between the two because the objective of the ban which was to reduce obesity was defeated. The man remained obese.
This is in line with Nadia's argument that the ban does not prevent anyone from drinking an unlimited amount of soda since they could simply buy two or more cans if they so desire.
