Etymology means basically studying how a word has evolved historically. So I think the answer will be DERIVATION.
Answer:
Answer below, combined into one.
Explanation:
No, we are not able to feed everyone on the planet due to the amount of waste created per every family. The average amount of food waste created by an American family is roughly 31.9% though, globally, that number is 30-40%. Let alone, climate change affects the course of food growth which can contribute to a high percentage of crop destruction due to rapid weather changes. To counteract this, farmers need to modernize their farming methods which isn't possible for countries that aren't as developed as countries that can't keep up with these agricultural changes. Therefore, we cannot successfully feed the whole world due to drastic changes in quality of life. Percentages and basic demonstrations of how our climate is rapidly changing is driving me to conclude that we simply cannot produce enough to feed our whole planet.
was the ride vast was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
was the ride vast
It would be C! the last thing that really happened would be romeo returning to verona however he didnt bring poison- resulting into him kissing the poison lff off juliets lils
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Roosevelt claims that the delegations must reject the new article because it changes the purpose of the UDHR. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
He claimed that the new article proposed by the soviet delegation is just a restatement of the state obligation. It is also not true to the character of the UDHR amendments and the obligations. It is simply a documentation which have certain obligations on it. It does not serves to the character of the principles and its statements.
