The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.
Answer: Option 1
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.
The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard. If in the case raised, then the President, only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid
In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.
Answer:
It says
Explanation:
Opinion about the salamander minimo vigente in Colombia
Answer:
you'd get your 1 cent that your entitled to
Explanation:
Because they don't have the right to take your 1 cent if you want it back but then again it depends on the tax
Answer:
ARE THESE FREE POINTS!?!?!?!
Explanation:
<h2>PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h2>
