1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedaia [141]
2 years ago
10

Pls subscribe my channel on yt

English
2 answers:
nevsk [136]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

no

Explanation:

Yakvenalex [24]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Oki will do

Explanation:

You might be interested in
HELPP ASAPP?!!!!
kkurt [141]
The answer for this question is A
5 0
2 years ago
Is the experience of being an outsider universal
QveST [7]
No because we all live in the same universe
3 0
3 years ago
What is most likely Betty Smith’s purpose in writing the novel A Tree Grows in Brooklyn?
g100num [7]

Answer:

A. To entertain

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from
Mars2501 [29]

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

8 0
4 years ago
PLEASE HELP
icang [17]

Answer:

Well let's look at the pros and cons

Pros:

-Able to keep in contact with people

-Able to watch movies and not be bored

cons:

- No one talks face to face with people anymore

-Homework never gets done because it's distracting

-Always checking phone to see if you got notifications

So I would say, it is a bad influence on people's family's.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the excerpt from act 1, scene 3, of Julius Caesar. CASSIUS. I know where I will wear this dagger then: Cassius from bondage
    8·1 answer
  • What are the verbs in this compound sentence?
    7·2 answers
  • STORY OF MY LIFE - One Direction
    9·2 answers
  • Who was Jane looking for ?
    11·1 answer
  • using pathos how could you persuade him/ her to reconsider their decision,“the principle has cancelled the prom.”
    9·1 answer
  • Which suffix would be added to earl, which means a British nobleman, to mean the "domain of an earl" or "land ruled by an earl"?
    15·2 answers
  • Which threatening act does Bob Ewell do with regard to the Finches?
    6·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from "The Scarlet Ibis.”
    14·1 answer
  • 8.The money collected from different sources will be combined to do four things. Find out what they are money​
    6·1 answer
  • Exercise 1 Circle the number in front of each complex sentence.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!