If I were given a chance to make a law on environmental protection, it would be on dealing with public littering. Its main features is having to provide suitable penalties or punishments to those who will litter on a public space which then benefits the whole community for a cleaner environment that is safe for humans and animals. The sanctions for those who would violate the law will have to be penalized regarding how much it affected a certain vicinity, specifically if the perpetrator is pleaded guilty.
Answer:
Yes, because privacy isn't an option, and it shouldn't be the price we accept for just getting on the internet.
Explanation:
Inmates are safer in accredited jails
California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrantless search and seizure of garbage left for collection outside the curtilage of a home.
Full case name: California v. Billy Greenwood and Dyanne Van Houten
Prior: Drug charges against defendants dismissed by California Superior Court ...
Citations: 486 U.S. 35 (more)108 S. Ct. 1625; 100 L. Ed. 2d 30; 56 U.S.L.W. 4409
Dissent: Brennan, joined by Marshall
Answer:
A reversible error is an error in trial proceedings that affects a party’s rights so significantly that it is grounds for reversal if the affected party properly objected at trial. Contrast with harmless error.
Explanation: