Answer:
With no "control" you have no base line to compare your results with, for whatever hypothesis your testing
Explanation:
Answer:
Different recommendations and conclusion can be drawn on human rights violation in government and communities.
Explanation:
1-Foremost thing that government can do is the legislation to control the human rights violation and this law should be applicable on all the people belong to any community. Government also make human rights violation issue a part of their policy so that every government could understand before hand.
2-Communities should run campaign so that people understand their human rights and can complain against such violations.
Human right violations happens all over the world but individuals and government need to work together to stop and eradicate such violations
Answer:
An element that does not show trespass to realty is: d) Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it.
Explanation:
Trespass to realty means that a person traspass a property or an object that does not belong to him or her. Element D) wouldn't count as trespass because it doesn´t said the object was there without the initial permission of the owner.
Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.
