C. Provide objective evidence that a transaction has taken place.
Answer:
Lowa should produce corn; Nebraska should produce Wheat
Explanation:
Two states: Iowa and Nebraska
Same two goods are produced by both of them: Corn and wheat
For lowa,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = 3 bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of wheat
For Nebraska,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = 3 bushels of wheat
According to the concept of comparative advantage, a country is exporting the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage and a country has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity is lower than the other country.
In our case, lowa should producing and exporting corn because the opportunity cost of producing corn is lower than the Nebraska and on the other hand, Nebraska should producing and exporting wheat because the opportunity cost of producing wheat is lower than the lowa.
Answer:
A technology company is growing rapidly and needs to hire experienced developers and marketing professionals. The best people in these fields usually have jobs and need to be enticed to apply elsewhere. To identify individuals who are likely to be a good match, hiring managers should<u> use social media.</u>
EXPLANATION:
Nowadays, social media has taken over and has helped in making several tasks easier. Job search and hiring have been made a lot easier by the use of social media platforms.
The hiring managers of the technology company should use social media platforms, for example, LinkedIn to reach out for all people that fit into the job. Using social media, one can easily screen out for people having experience similar to the job requirements.
Answer:
Part a. Manufacturing the goods at home and let overseas sales managers handle the marketing.
Advantages
- Can have a full authority in production activities.
- It is easy to set up a strategy and multiply the manufacturing.
- Having better regulator over human resources.
- The foreign sales agents will enhanced the understanding of European marketplaces.
- It lower the exit costs if product fails.
Disadvantages
- Having lack of information in European pharmaceutical procedures.
- The foreign agents may damage the brand name if not prudently handled.
- Additional costs in delivery of the products.
Part b. Manufacture the products at home and set up a wholly owned subsidiary in Europe to handle marketing.
Advantages
- Having full control in manufacturing activities.
- It is easy to set up a strategy and multiply the manufacturing.
- Having better regulator over human resources.
- The brand name will not be damaged since the marketing is controlled by the same company
Disadvantages
- Utilization of extra resources to be consumed on marketing
- Having lack of information in European pharmaceutical procedures.
- Additional costs in delivery of the products
- Having lack of information in European pharmaceutical procedures
Part c. Enter into a strategic alliance with a large European pharmaceutical firm. The product would be manufactured in Europe by the 50/50 joint venture and marketed by the European firm
Advantages
- The risk is distributed among the firms.
- No additional delivery cost included.
- Knowledge of European organization will be valuable in
- understanding guidelines and advertising in European markets.
Disadvantages
- Having less control in manufacturing activities
- Shared of the profit among the partners.
- Moderate level of exit cost is included.
- Additional firm may harm the brand image.
Answer: SEE EXPLANATION
A. 198.27 UNITS
B. 99.14 UNITS
C. 30.76 ORDERS
D. 8.12 DAYS
E. $1,784.43
Explanation:
Given the following ;
Annual order = 6,100
Carrying cost = $9 per unit per year
Ordering cost = $29
A) EOQ =sqrt[( 2 × Annual order × (ordering cost ÷ carrying cost)]
EOQ = sqrt[2 ×6100 × (29÷9)]
EOQ = sqrt(12200 × 3.22222222)
EOQ = 198.27 units
B.) AVERAGE INVENTORY :
EOQ ÷ 2
198.27 ÷ 2 = 99.14 UNITS
C.) Optimal number of orders per year:
Demand / order per year
6,100 ÷ 198.27 = 30.76 orders
D.) Optimal number of days between two orders:
Number of working days ÷ optimal number of orders
250 ÷ 30.76 = 8.12 days.
E.) Annual cost of ordering and holding inventory:
$198.27 × $9 = $1,784.43