Answer:
The answer is "Option a"
Explanation:
In the given question only "option a" is correct, which can be described as follows:
- He is the owner and managing director of an organization and recently he introduced media attention initiatives to encourage a specific app controlled by federal law.
- Its law is rather ambiguous. He reviewed the relevant law before starting the initiative and met with his counsel in an attempt to comply with the rule. Even so, this state attorney general's office also filed a suit against him after misleading publicity.
- He provides the best defense, which acted in good faith with proper research and in line with an unspecified rule.
Answer:
Microsoft will choses High price and you will choose to enter the market .
Explanation:
The Nash equilibrium
<u> You </u>
<u> enter Don't enter</u>
Microsoft high price ( $30 , $10 ) ( $60 , $0 )
Microsoft low price ( $20, -$5 ) ( $50, $0 )
From the Nash equilibrium the best time for you to enter the market is when Microsoft Charges a high price
While the best time for Microsoft is when it charges a high price and you do not enter the market
But considering Simultaneous Move game : Microsoft will choses High price and you will choose to enter the market .
The answer is : the nominal value would be equal to the $800 face value of the paycheck. The nominal value is the book, par or face value, which in the case of the paycheck is $800.00
Answer:
A failure of the financial sector.
Explanation:
Financial sector indicates all banks and non-banking institutions. These sectors are the source of money supply in an economy. If this sector fails to do such work, the economy might face severe money crisis and the effect would be immediate. An example of it is 2007-08 depression in the US economy.
Answer:
Polycentric orientation.
Explanation:
The polycentric orientation, referring to the management of the global marketplace, is a market vision (and in a great sense also political) that establishes that there is no single central point in a globalized market, but that each country has a strategic importance in the different sectors market that most concern you. Thus, the idea of market leaders is rejected, but rather the idea of a fragmented market in different sectors, with varied leaders, is defended.
