1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dalvyx [7]
3 years ago
12

Amy convenes a meeting to rethink the organizational structure to avoid being beat to the market by a competitor again. Based on

your initial impressions of the situation, which solution do you think might be more effective: increase formalization or reduce hierarchy
Business
1 answer:
Natalija [7]3 years ago
6 0

Amy should reduce hierarchy if she wants to avoid being beaten by competitors.

A reduction of hierarchy will realign the company to achieve its goals faster than operating with a formalized hierarchy. This restructuring or delayering is known as empowerment.

The advantages that Amy will achieve by delayering or reducing hierarchy include:

  • Simplifying the organization's management structures
  • Reducing its bureaucracy
  • Cutting its communication paths
  • Speeding up decision-making
  • Pushing responsibility down to lower organizational levels (through empowerment).

Thus, Amy should rethink the organizational structure by reducing the hierarchy, making the decision-making process accessible.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/10849707

You might be interested in
What is protectionism and why would a country base trade policy on it? Explain at least two reasons.
Anton [14]
Protectionism is a government or economic policy that does not allow foreign or international trade through methods and variety of government regulations outlined to promote fair competition with the goods and services made domestically. Business and workers were protected within a country through regulating or obstructing trade with different countries.

<span>A country should base trade policy for two reasons. 1.) It protects local businesses and jobs.  2.) It promotes fair competition on the local goods and services.</span>


3 0
3 years ago
"Mrs. Smith operates a business in a competitive market. The current market price is $8.10. At her profit-maximizing level of pr
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

Mrs.Smith should continue to operate the business in the short run but shut down in the long run.

Explanation:

According to the shut down rule, at the profit-maximizing positive level of output, a business in a competitive market should continue to operate in the short-term if the price equals to or is greater than the average variable cost, but should shut down in the long term if the price is less than or equal to total cost. Here,

price = $8.10

avg variable cost = $8.00

avg total cost = $8.25

Mrs.Smith should continue to operate the business in the short run but shut down in the long run.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An economy is operating with output $400 billion above its natural level, and fiscal policymakers want to close this expansionar
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer: reduced by $80 billion

Explanation:

An expansionary gap is when the actual output is more than the potential output. From the question, we are told that an economy is operating with output $400 billion above its natural level, and fiscal policymakers want to close this expansionary gap and that the central bank agrees to adjust the money supply to hold the interest rate constant, so there is no crowding out.

We are also given the marginal propensity to consume is 4/5, and told that the price level is completely fixed in the short run.

To close the expansionary gap, the government would need to reduce its spending. To solve this, we have to calculate the multiplier. This will be:

Multiplier = 1/(1 - MPC)

= 1/(1 - 4/5)

= 1/1-0.8

= 1/0.2

= 5

Therefore, the government expenditure or spending will be reduced by:

= $400 billion/5

=$80 billion

3 0
3 years ago
Records at Hal’s Accounting Services show the following costs for year 1. Direct materials and supplies $ 40,000 Employee costs
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

See answers below

Explanation:

a. Direct materials & supplies  $40,000 = $40,000 × 110%

= $44,000 × 20,000/25,000

= $35,200

Employee costs = $2,900,000 × 105%

= $3,045,000 × 20,000/25,000

= $2,346,000

Variable overhead = $600,000 × 100%

= $600,000 × 20,000/25000

= $480,000

Fixed overhead = $700,000 × 105%

= $735,000

b. Total costs per unit year 2 =

$3,596,000 / 20,000

= $179.81

6 0
3 years ago
Brian is a truck driver who delivers products throughout Massachusetts. His friend Chris is a traffic planner for the same state
Bond [772]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Getting a loan you have to repay is known as
    10·1 answer
  • On November 1, 2018, Reid Corporation acquired bonds with a face value of $700,000 for $673,618.61. The bonds carry a stated rat
    11·1 answer
  • Why is a sales tax a regressive tax?
    5·1 answer
  • The Securities Investor Protection Corporation is a government agency charged with administering the liquidation of failed secur
    10·1 answer
  • If a 1 percent decrease in price results in less than a 1 percent increase in the quantity demanded, demand is Multiple Choice c
    11·1 answer
  • Myers Corporation has the following data related to direct materials costs for November: actual costs for 5,000 pounds of materi
    12·2 answers
  • Data from the financial statements of Dils Brothers Co. and J. Cox, Inc. are presented below (in millions): Dils Brothers Co. J.
    7·1 answer
  • In the short run a) a firm does not have sufficient time to change any of the resources it uses. b) a firm does not have suffici
    15·1 answer
  • If net operating income is $34,000, average operating assets are $204,000, and the minimum required rate of return is 15%, what
    11·1 answer
  • How much of a song can I use in a project ?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!