Answer:
maximal ignorance—5
Explanation:
The conclusion is a maximal ignorance because the information presented in the premises is not relevant to the overall argument.
The situation above is an example of correctional behaviorist since the teacher performed rectification in the behavior of her student, Amani during the course of the situation. This may incur negative or positive effects to the person depending on how the person takes the criticism.
Answer:
This was the Sphinx's riddle: What goes on four feet in the morning, two feet at noon, and three feet in the evening? (Answer: a person: A person as a baby in the morning of their life crawls on four feet (hands and knees). As an adult in the noon of their life, they walk on two feet.Sep 15, 2016
Explanation:
The answer is "conventional morality".
In the concept of conventional morality a person starts
understanding the importance of other people and society as opposed to the pre
conventional morality where he or she only focuses on himself. In conventional
morality the rules of respect, fairness and agency display themselves and
people recognize that they are a part of a greater society which has rules.
