This argument is based on <span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis
According to </span><span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis, the language that people use in our day to day life will heavily influence the view/cognition of the speaker.
For example, if a person tend to use high-energy language, that person will be more likely to feel optimistic in facing the problem in front of him/her</span>
Answer:
Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war. Still, others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.
Explanation:
i love this question.
you did not upload an image but I’ll be happy to help when you do
Clinicians can utilise a systematic interviewing strategy described in the manual to arrive at a diagnosis for DSM. They respond to questions that are posed objectively about the person's perceptible behaviours on five different levels, or axes.
The classification has a satisfactory level of reliability. In collaboration with the International Classification of Diseases, DSM diagnoses are created (ICD). Diagnostic labels, according to DSM-IV detractors, can stigmatise a person by skewing how others interpret and perceive their past and present activities as well as how they are perceived by others. The advantages of diagnostic labels are that they facilitate communication between mental health practitioners regarding treatment and therapy and that they create a common language for thought-sharing among researchers looking into the causes and therapies of diseases.
Learn more about DSM here:
brainly.com/question/29440663
#SPJ4
