Answer:
Total E&P = $ 160000
Total voting Right Sold = 50/ (100+100) = 25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 160000*25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 40000
Reduction of E& P Lower of Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold or Amount realised
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or (50*1000)
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or 50000
Answer
A reduction of $40,000 in E&P because of the exchange.
Answer:
Explanation:
Net sales - $894,250
Cost of Goods - $ 616850
Average account receivable - $40,650
Account receivable at year end - $28200
Average inventory - $182000
Inventory at year end - $158,000
Inventory turn over
Cost of Goods sold / Average inventory for the period
616850/182000= 3.40 times
No of days sales in inventory = Ending inventory / Cost of Goods sold *365
158000/616850*365 = 93.5 days
Account receivable turnover = net credit sale / average receivable
894250/40650=21.9
No of days sales in account receivable -
Receivable at year end/total credit sales*365
28200/894250*365= 11.5 days
Answer:
$6 billion
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what consumption spending would initially decrease by
Using this formula
Decrease in Consumption spending=MPC * New taxes on household income
Let plug in the formula
Decrease in Consumption spending=0.6*$10 billion
Decrease in Consumption spending=$6 billion
Therefore consumption spending would initially decrease by $6 billion
Answer:
C.$16 of overhead cost should be assigned to each wooden gazebo and
$40 of overhead cost should be assigned to each metal gazebo
Explanation:
2,000 wooden x 4 hours = 8,000 labor hours
500 metal x 10 = 5,000 labor hours
total hours 13,000
single manufacturing overhead: 52,000 / 13,000 = $4 per labor hours
wooden gazebos: 4hours x $4 = $ 16
metal gazebos: 10 hours x $4 = $40
Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
