0.60 × collection = 27 cars
collection = 27 cars / 0.60 . . . . divide by the coefficient of the variable
collection = 45 cars
Samuel has 45 cars in his collection.
Some critics of corporate social responsibility see spending money on CSR as stealing from investors.
<h3 /><h3>What is Corporate Social Responsibility?</h3>
They are organizational practices to improve the perception of an organization in the market through voluntary practices of community development where they are inserted, contributing with social benefits that exceed legal requirements.
Companies usually implement corporate social responsibility programs as a way of demonstrating to society their concern for local needs, which is also a way of promoting the brand and establishing relationship marketing with end consumers.
For some critics of CSR, they believe that companies should not be promoters of social justice, but their focus should be focused only on profitability.
Therefore, critics of CSR argue that organizations use investors' resources to develop such social programs, and this resource should be invested to increase profitability.
Find out more about Corporate Social Responsability here:
brainly.com/question/1373962
#SPJ1
Answer:
Social life is the correct answer.
Explanation:
In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
<h3>Regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978)</h3>
In the ruling the supreme court ruled that the use of affirmative action programmes which allows the admission of minority applicants in the universities is a constitutional process in certain circumstances, while the use of racial quotas for the admission into universities was ruled as unconstitutional.
Hence we can conclude In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
Learn more Regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978) :brainly.com/question/412541
#SPJ1
The correct answer is D. Have other scientists repeat the procedure and obtain the same results.
Explanation:
One of the most accurate ways to validate the results of an experiment is to allow peers (other scientists) to review the experiment and repeat it, which is known as replication. This process is required to make sure the results are accurate because if the experiment is repeated by a different scientist and the results are different this shows the data is not consistent and therefore the results are invalid. Moreover, inconsistency or lack of replication can occur due to incorrect processes or bias by the scientist.
According to this, the next step in this situation is to "have other scientists repeat the procedure and obtain the same results".On the other hand, repeating the experiment but changing one of the variables or the procedures is not a correct step because this will change the essence of the experiment and lead to different results.
