Answer:
Mike has a comparative advantage in the production of computers.
Explanation:
Mike's opportunity cost of producing trucks instead of computers = 10 / 10 = 1.
Mike's opportunity cost of producing computers instead of trucks is 10 / 10 = 1.
Debra's opportunity cost of producing trucks instead of computers = 3 / 9 = 0.333.
Debra's opportunity cost of producing computers instead of trucks = 9 / 3 = 3.
Mike's opportunity cost of producing computers instead of trucks is 1, while Debra's is 3. Therefore, Mike has a comparative advantage in the production of computers.
Answer:
a. iii. Too little
b. i. The industry's supply of cashews will exceed Q1 and the price of cashews will equal P1.
Explanation:
Allocative efficiency refers to the point in production where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal cost. As this is a perfectly competitive market, marginal revenue is the same as price which as shown in the question, exceeds Marginal cost. The firms are therefore producing too little to achieve allocative efficiency and need to produce more to make price and marginal cost equal.
In the long run, the firms will produce more such that supply would exceed the original quantity supplied of Q1. This will lead to the price falling back to P1 as there is now less scarcity.
C is your answer C) master budget
Answer:
A) $102,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount used today for preparing the operating budget is shown below:
= Contract value × forward rate
= $100,000 × $1.02
= $102,000
For computing this, we consider the forward rate and the same is multiplied with the contract value so that the correct amount can come.
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
Yes it is copyright infringement.
In order for someone to transfer any material (in this case music) digitally or online, it must be copied first. So when someone produces a digital sampling of copyrighted material, no matter if it only lasts a couple of seconds, it constitutes copyright infringement.
