All categories

3 years ago

Why did the banana split

1 answer:

4 0

In 1907, Ernest R. Hazard supposedly invented the banana split. He owned a restaurant in Wilmington, Ohio, and he hoped that a new ice cream treat would attract students from Wilmington College. According to legend, Hazard sponsored a competition to invent the new treat.

You might be interested in

Why it is important for Latin american nations to diversify their economies

Travka [436]

It is important for Latin America to diversify it's economy because for one thing, L.A. wouldn't have to take the risks of a failed business by relying on one crop or resource. Another reason is that more diverse crops or resources brings in a steady amount of money with varied products, and L.A. would be taking their chances by just relying on one crop/resources.

5 0

3 years ago

Which agency monitors the sale and registration of vehicles and vessels within the state?

Alenkasestr [34]

Answer:

Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

4 0

3 years ago

1. Which case established that police must obtain search warrants if they want to make subsequent return visits to a crime scene

iogann1982 [59]

The primary crime scene would be the locker room. This is because they can scan the employee's locker for finger prints and other evidence of who might have been the one to take the keys.

The case that established that police must obtain a search warrant to make additional visits to a crime scene was Mincey v the State of Arizona which made it's way to the supreme court on <span>June 21, 1978.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Differentiate between fair descrimination and unfair discrimination,and also use relevent examples

serg [7]

Answer:

Fair discrimination- Discrimination means treating some people differently from others. It isn't always unlawful - after all, people are paid different wages depending on their status and skills. However, there are certain reasons for which your employer can't discriminate against you by law. Discrimination happens when an employer treats one employee less favourably than others. It could mean a female employee being paid less than a male colleague for doing the same job, or an employee from a minority ethnic community being refused the training opportunities offered to other colleagues.

There are specific laws against some types of discrimination (called 'unlawful discrimination'). If your employer treats you less favourably for an unlawful reason, you may be able to take action. If your employer treats you unfairly for any other reason, this is not unlawful discrimination.

There are laws against discrimination on the basis of your:

-gender

-marriage or civil partnership

-gender reassignment

-pregnancy and maternity leave

-sexual orientation

-disability

-race

-colour

-ethnic background

-nationality

-religion or political opinion

-age

Unfair discrimination- Unfair discrimination is when you are treated differently as compared to other categories of people and that your dignity as a human being is impaired by such treatment.

Discrimination is regarded as unfair when it imposes burdens or withholds benefits or opportunities from any person on one of the prohibited grounds listed in the Act, namely: race, gender, sex, pregnancy, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth etc.

It is important to note that the Act does not prohibit discrimination but unfair discrimination.There are certain circumstances where discrimination can be regarded as fair e.g. measures designed to advance persons disadvantaged by the previous system of racial discrimination.

Cases for fair discrimination (read case)- The new amendments to the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (the EEA) assist employers in defending unfair discrimination claims by enabling employers to show that the alleged unfair discrimination is justifiable. Prior to the amendment, an employer was only able to escape liability by showing that the discrimination in question was fair.

Hope it helps!!!

3 0

3 years ago

90 points and brainliest if u actually answer

velikii [3]

Paragraph 1. I believe that Mathew farmer stole the tools the most reliable peice of evidence that I used to determine the awnser is Anthony's diary.I think the evidence is the most reliable because diary I really arnt meant to be read by anyone but yourself so why would he lie in his own diary. I learned from the source that Mathews dad had gotten injured resentally and in that period in time there was a drought which caused people to fall on hard times. In that time farm tools had become expensive because people needed them to provide food for there families. The type of source that was used was a diary. The purpose of this source /or how it was created/ was for the use of a personal diary for will Anthony. This source is primary because it was made before the scene of the crime.

Paragraph 2.

The least reliable peice of evidence presented in the case was the photograph made in 2010. The photo showed and image of Mathew farmer outside the shop the night of the crime. The reason i think this evidence is lease reliable is that it was made in 2012 which makes it a secondary source made hundreds of years later so there could be no real evidence to that photograph. The purpose of the photo was to show what might of happend the night of the crime. The source is also a secondary source because it was made by a secondary source not an eye witness.

5 0

3 years ago