Difference between presidents and governors

History

2 answers:

irga5000 [103]4 years ago

8 0

The president is in charge of the whole country. The governor is only in charge of the state.

zloy xaker [14]4 years ago

7 0

The President, it is who is the executive head of the nation. He along with the Vice President is elected through an electoral college in which every state has a number of seats proportional to its representation in the congress that comprises both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

As for the governor...

Governor is the executive head of his state (there are 50 Governors at present). In the constitution of the country, the states are not provinces but semi-autonomous entities that have the powers not automatically granted to the federal government. This means that states are not subordinates to the federation but have enough powers in themselves.

Understand? They both have different "powers" over things and work very differently.

You might be interested in

This image is MOST closely related to which important home-front activity?

Aliun [14]

Answer:

um there is no image...maybe show the image and I could help you...

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

In 1965, which of the following figures delivered a famous speech before Congress to request the passage of the Voting Rights Ac

rusak2 [61]

In 1965, which of the following figures delivered a famous speech before Congress to request the passage of the Voting Rights Act?

d) Dr.Martin Luther King,Jr.

4 0

3 years ago

When Nigerian get our of slave trade

DochEvi [55]

History of Slavery in Nigeria
Although local slavery was officially prohibited by the colonial British administration from the mid-1880s, they tacitly permitted it to continue well into the 1930s, ending completely only in the 1940s.

5 0

3 years ago

One of the most important results of the Crusades was that A. permanent Christian kingdoms were established in the Near East. B.

Paha777 [63]

Answer:

C. trade and cultural exchanges with Asia were encouraged.

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Where was Scott taken by his slaveholder to live? Virginia and Alabama Illinois and Wisconsin Missouri and Virginia

arlik [135]

Dred Scot was taken to live in St.Louis by his slaveholder. this is because during his trial, he stated that since his slaveholder had taken him to live in a free state, that meant that he was now a free man. hope this helps!

7 0

3 years ago