1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AURORKA [14]
4 years ago
15

Difference between presidents and governors

History
2 answers:
irga5000 [103]4 years ago
8 0
The president is in charge of the whole country. The governor is only in charge of the state.
zloy xaker [14]4 years ago
7 0
<span>The President, it is who is the executive head of the nation. He along with the Vice President is elected through an electoral college in which every state has a number of seats proportional to its representation in the congress that comprises both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

As for the governor...

</span><span>Governor is the executive head of his state (there are 50 Governors at present). In the constitution of the country, the states are not provinces but semi-autonomous entities that have the powers not automatically granted to the federal government. This means that states are not subordinates to the federation but have enough powers in themselves. 

Understand? They both have different "powers" over things and work very differently.
</span>

You might be interested in
Which attitude cited by a 1973 report issued by the U.S, Fire Administration reflects the view of the average American citizen t
Leno4ka [110]

Answer:

The attitude of:"It can't happen to me"

8 0
4 years ago
Explain examples where the United States did not colonize a country, but “influenced” it to receive things they wanted
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

no one is that I can get it to you tomorrow at the same time ago i used to

6 0
3 years ago
You could travel backwards in time to watch what was going on, when and where would you visit?
Delvig [45]

Answer:moon

Explanation:moon

4 0
3 years ago
Which statement best summarizes how the people of South Carolina responded to the formation of the Sons of Liberty?
PolarNik [594]

People of South Carolina responded to the formation of the Sons of Liberty by forming one of the most active groups, using violence and threats to protest British policies.

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

Sons of liberty was an action taken by all the colonies which were under the control of the British. This step was to protest against the Stamp act that was started by the colonist British under which the colonies had to pay taxes even if they did not even wish to.

The Sons of liberty was one of the most famous groups formed in the colony of South Carolina where some people called themselves the Sons of liberty and became violent to protest against the policies of the British.

4 0
3 years ago
What damage did ww2 cause
Hunter-Best [27]
Making people very bloody
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Difference between past present and future is an example of ?
    5·1 answer
  • A human made object, such as a tool, weapon, or piece of jewelry.
    15·2 answers
  • What is the job of the judiciary committee
    5·1 answer
  • WORTH BRAINLIST!!!Which one is true? Asia made more contributions to society then africa #2: Africa made more contributions to s
    15·1 answer
  • Question: What do you think the Ottomans will do with the city of Constantinople now that it is under their control?​
    15·1 answer
  • How exactly did Shaka Zulu die? I know he was assassinated but how? Was he stabbed to death clubbed drugged or burned?
    12·1 answer
  • Which was NOT one of the requirements of the Versailles Treaty?
    6·1 answer
  • Which country benefited more the french or the british?
    12·1 answer
  • In his raid on harpers ferry, john brown intended to
    6·1 answer
  • HELPP I’ll mark u brainly !!!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!