The Stamp Act, Tea Act and Intolerable Acts were put into place without the consent of the colonists. This proved that Britain was not treating them as citizens, but merely as servants to their mother country.
The Americans realized that Britain was not going to stop enacting laws in the colonies this way, and they knew that secession was inevitable.
The United States did not complain as there were at the time fears of a war between U.S. and the Soviets. John F.Kennedy is quoted as having said:"A wall is much better than a war".
Based on the quote, critics of NAFTA might have claimed that:
A) Mexican workers would be unfairly taken advantage of
<h3>What can be deduced about the critics of NAFTA from the text?</h3>
The critics of NAFTA believe that Mexico was not as strong as the other countries who entered the trade agreement so the possibility that they will be taken advantage of was there.
Having read the above statement from the 1993 agreement of NAFTA, we can see that the reference to the United Mexican states must have proved that the union was needed to stand side by side with the American and Canadian states.
Critics might have believed that Mexico was vulnerable and could be unfairly taken advantage of in the deal.
Learn more about NAFTA here:
brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ1
The Texas Oil Boom! This was a period of dramatic change and economic growth in the US State of Texas during the early 20th century.
Answer:
i think they are.
Explanation:
I think they are because if they done some horrible stuff other people might not want to be around them because of what they done and don't want the same.
