Answer:
Wholistic Health Services Co.
Income Statement for the year end February 28, 2019
Service Revenue $270,900
Less: Supplies Expense <u>$3,000 </u>
Gross Income $267,900
Less operating Expenses:
Insurance Expense $4,000
Depreciation Expense $9,000
Miscellaneous Expense $6,000
Utilities Expense $1,760
Rent Expense $4,200
Wages Expense <u>$213,000</u>
<u>$237,960</u>
Net Income <u>$29,940 </u>
Explanation:
Income statement shows the performance of the company in a year. It provides the details of revenue, expenses and profits for the year. All the expenses are deducted from the revenue to determine the net earning of the business.
Answer: d. $240,400
Explanation:
To calculate the Cost of Goods sold for the year we simply add the Opening Balance of Finished goods to the Cost of Goods for the year and then subtract the Finished goods balance at year end (ending).
That would be,
= 233,000 + 31,600 - 24,200
= $240,400
$240,400 is the Cost of Goods sold for the year so Option D is correct.
Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.
