1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnyKZ [126]
3 years ago
8

How did the invention of printing help in the exploration of the New World

History
2 answers:
Salsk061 [2.6K]3 years ago
6 0
It was easier to create maps to record their findings, and later on printing helped with creating newspapers in bulk. Hope this helped
pshichka [43]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

News about the explorer's adventures spread faster, news reached more people, more people could get interested in exploring, thus increasing the number of explorers in the long run

Explanation:

The printing press allowed the newspaper to reach every corner of a country. When people learned that there was great profit from exploring the new world, they got interested and more people were enthusiastic to travel across the sea, to claim new lands, settlements, discover treasures, and so on. As more explorations took place, more land was easily covered.

You might be interested in
What are two arguments nativists made for immigrant restriction.
miv72 [106K]

Beginning at the end of the nineteenth century, immigration into the United States rocketed to never-before-seen heights. Many of these new immigrants were coming from eastern and southern Europe and for many English-speaking, native-born Americans of northern European descent the growing diversity of new languages, customs, and religions triggered anxiety and racial animosity.

In reaction, some embraced nativism, prizing white Americans with older family trees over more recent immigrants and rejecting outside influences in favor of their own local customs. Nativists also stoked a sense of fear over the perceived foreign threat, pointing to the anarchist assassinations of the Spanish prime minister in 1897, the Italian king in 1900, and even President William McKinley in 1901 as proof. Following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in November 1917, the sense of an inevitable foreign or communist threat grew among those already predisposed to distrust immigrants.

The sense of fear and anxiety over the rising tide of immigration came to a head with the trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Sacco and Vanzetti were Italian immigrants who were accused of participating in a robbery and murder in Braintree, Massachusetts, in 1920. There was no direct evidence linking them to the crime, but—in addition to being immigrants—both men were anarchists who favored the destruction of the American market-based, capitalistic society through violence. At their trial, the district attorney emphasized Sacco and Vanzetti’s radical views, and the jury found them guilty on July 14, 1921.

Despite subsequent motions and appeals based on ballistics testing, recanted testimony, and an ex-convict’s confession, both men were executed on August 23, 1927.

8 0
3 years ago
How did class conflict shape the Roman Republic?
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

In the Roman Republic, there were two classes - patricians and plebeians. Patricians had full authority, which plebeians didn't accepted. They fought for their rights, and gained them. That is why Roman Republic transformed in total.

Explanation:

Patricians were wealthy landowners who were bringing all major decisions. Plebeians who were mostly poor wanted some type of representative in the government. They retreated from the city, thus making patricians to accept some of their requests. Among the other things, they could vote, enter the Senate, even take the role of consuls.

5 0
3 years ago
4.
serious [3.7K]
I think it is b because
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Rome’s legislative branch, plebeians served in the Assemblies while the senates members were
eduard
The correct answer is : patricians
3 0
3 years ago
How is the Bill of Rights contained in the Texas Constitution different from the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitutio
yan [13]

Answer:How is the Bill of Rights contained in the Texas Constitution different from the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution? Question options: The Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution states that rights it defines cannot be taken away from citizens. The Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution states that the rights it defines cannot be taken away Texans. The Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution guarantees rights to those accused of a crime, while the United States Constitution Bill of Rights does not. The Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution guarantees rights to those accused of a crime, while the Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution does not.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • how did the outcome of the french and indian war change the relationship between the american colonists and the british ?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the second continental congress? why was this important to the colonist?
    8·1 answer
  • What problem of government does the separation of powers address?
    14·1 answer
  • Lumber Mill Inc. is a private employer with more than twenty employees. Its employment practices do not indicate a past pattern
    12·1 answer
  • A king at the age of 9, he was raised by the clergy and therefore easily led by the church
    11·1 answer
  • Select the third-parties from the list below. Select all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • While researching Internet articles, Jane realizes that many of the facts and viewpoints in an article by D. Smith differ drasti
    5·1 answer
  • How did ancient Indian math influence modern computer technology?
    5·2 answers
  • Which dynasty led China during the golden age described here?
    6·1 answer
  • 3. How did the Grangers, who were poor farmers, do battle with the giant railroad companies?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!