This is because both sides sustained approx. similar number of causalities.
Out of 75,000 Union Army soldiers, over 2,100 were killed and a further 10,300 were injured.
The Confederates had an Army of 52,000 out of which 2,770 were killed and 11,000 were wounded.
It is also called the Battle of Sharpsburg and is known as the 'bloodiest' day in American history due to the sheet number of men who lost their lives.
The battle was tactically inclusive, however, it was a strategic and political win for the Union
Answer:
B). The confounding of class section (morning, afternoon) and response method (clicker, notebook).
Explanation:
The given research study would not be able to reach a worthy conclusion or results as the study is flawed due to 'the confounding of class section (morning, afternoon) and response method (clicker, notebook).' Thus, the comparison or assessment of two sections through different methods would lead to bafflement or confusion(due to testing different sections of the class(morning, afternoon) through different methods(clicker, notebook) that would restrict the researchers to reach a conclusion. Therefore, the study would not reach a deduction and hence, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
It is because of it estimated benefit
Explanation:
The estimated benefit is about 2500, since 5×500=2500, so it has a good estimated benefit.
Answer:
A stable system cannot be maintained in democracy, because that system needs no moderation and democracy is a moderating policy.
Explanation:
Democracy is a policy established by the will of the people. It opposes authoritarian governance that has the control power emanating from one person, giving that power to the people of a region and allowing that people to make the choices of governance and established policies.
Democracy has a moderating character and for that reason, it needs to be installed in an unstable system, allowing people to have options of choice and through instability, to understand which option is better.
The correct answer is C. Precipitating factors
Explanation:
In collective behavior, "precipitating factors" refers to one of the factors or triggers of collective behaviors or those factors or behavior from individuals that represent a cause for a collective response and that usually linked to a dramatic event that led to others. This is the case of a "boy throwing rocks during a demonstration" because this action becomes a factor for a specific response from a collectivity but during this stage the collectivity has not mobilized for action or act to achieve a purpose; additionally as part of precipitating factors this situation is linked to a dramatical event that can create further actions from a group of people.
