Answer:
discrimination.
Explanation:
Prejudice is the unjustified belief towards a group of people based on their affiliation to a different race, religion, political party, occupation, etc. While these beliefs remain affective and cognitive they called prejudice but when they start to reflect in action they are called discrimination. Therefore discrimination can be defined as unjustifiable treatment towards an individual based on their membership to a particular group.
Answer:
<h3>Atticus does not actually reprimand Scout for going with Calpurnia to church.</h3>
Explanation:
When Scout asked Atticus about what [email protected] is, she did mention that she asked the same question to Calpurnia while she and Jem went to church with her. Atticus does not say anything about the church but he only tries to explain what [email protected] actually meant because Calpurnia did not tell Scout when she asked her.
Atticus actually reprimands Scout for yelling at her Aunt Alexandria. She breaks the rule of no yelling and being disrespectful to others which makes Atticus angry.
"Does the BCBA have consent to share video of the research subjects in this capacity?" are some ethical considerations the bcba should keep in mind.
A person holding a certification in applied behaviour analysis is known as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The Behavior Analyst Credential Board awards this certification to BCBAs. Applied behavioural analysis (ABA) employs methodical, scientific and ethical procedures to assist change a person's behaviour.
BCBA can work in educational settings such as classrooms, hospitals, clinics, and nonprofit organisations; many of them have areas of expertise such as autism, developmental impairments, or mental health problems. That is undoubtedly one application, but there are a tonne more.
ABA is used in human resources, education, and even mobile app development. Behavior analysts employ a variety of methods to assist in achieving desired results.
Know more about BCBA here
brainly.com/question/28284522
#SPJ4
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
They all refer to the different types of government systems there are. An example would be that the United States has a a federal government system because both the state governments and national government share equal power.
