Answer:
Yes. Such an action constitutes a tort and a crime.
Explanation:
A tort is a wrong done to another person while a crime is the breaking of the law of the state or Federal government. Put simply, a tort is a wrongdoing on a personal level while a crime is a wrongdoing on a societal level, while tort is privately morally wrong, crime is publicly legally wrong.
In the scenario above there is a 'tort' because the employees are spitting into the food of those they do not like. This is on a personal level as they are not spitting into the food of every customer but only the food of those they dislike. Also, a crime exists because this is happening at a public place. It can be said that those restaurants are intentionally serving unhealthy foods to members of the public and both the owners and employees of those restaurants could be charged.
Answer:
Are you trying to get the moral vs ethical.
Explanation:
i need the same thing
He factors<span> which </span>contributed to the rise of nationalism in the 1810s<span> were the general zeitgeist of the people who considered that the ethnic groups of Europe should live in their own countries and not in huge empires where their particular ethnic group wasn't represented. Hope this works!</span>
Distraction.
In order to effectively listen to another person when they are speaking to you all other distractions should be eliminated so your complete focus and attention is on the person speaking and nothing else. In this case the distraction was the tv. By switching it off Bjorn has eliminated the barrier to effective listening.
