350 because 25x10 is 250 and 20x5 is 100 so you add them and get 350
<span>To do these you will be adding or subtracting 2pi (or integer multiples of .
Since the given angles are in fraction form, it will help to have 2pi in fraction form, 2pi=10/5=6pi/3=4pi/2=18pi/9 NOTE: this>(/) stands for over like 1 over 2 EX. 1/2
too, so the addition/subtraction is easier.
Hint: When deciding if you have a number between 0 and 2pi, compare it to the fraction version of 2pi that you've been adding/subtracting.
For 17pi/5...
First we can see that 17pi/5 is more than 10pi/5 (aka 2pi). So we need to start subtracting: 17pi/5 - 10pi/5 = 7pi/5
Now we have a number between 0 and 10pi/5. So 7pi/5 is the co-terminal angle between 0 and 2pi.
I'll leave the others for you to do. Just remember that you might have to add or subtract multiple times before you get a number between 0 and 2pi.
P.S don't add or subtract at all if the number starts out between 0 and 2pi.</span>
Answer:
$176
Step-by-step explanation:
$200 x 12%
12% --> 0.12
200 x 0.12 = 24 --> discounted off amount
200 - 24 = 176
.2 converted to a fraction would be 1/5
Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
