The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Explain to them that they have the right to remain silent, in which any words that they say may be used against them in court
The answer is B. to control all laws in each state. I think. :3
Answer:
option D.
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D.
Michael is devout and very active in Church but due to promotion he has to work on Sundays then in this situation he will experience role conflict.
Role conflict occurs when an incompatible demand is placed in front of the employee in which he has to make decision from the two important works.
like, in this case, Michael has to choose between Church and Promotion.