Answer:
Graph 1: Consistent Dependent
Graph 2: Consistent Independent
Graph 3: Consistent Dependent
Graph 4: Inconsistent
Step-by-step explanation:
Consistent means they have at least one solution. So lines that intersect once or lines that intersect infinitely many times are both consistent systems.
If they are the system that has one solution they are considered independent.
If they are the system that has infinitely many solutions then are considered dependent.
Inconsistent means they won't intersect at all.
First graph shows the same line graphed onto itself. That means they have infinitely many solutions and is therefore a consistent dependent system.
Second graph shows the lines intersecting once. That means they have one solution and therefore is a consistent independent system.
Third graph shows the same description of graph one and is therefore a consistent dependent system.
The last graph shows parallel lines. Parallel lines do not intersect and therefore do not have a solution. So this system is inconsistent.
Answer:
9+10=21
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
sila put a wrong number in her calculator when multiplying the numerators
Step-by-step explanation:
Sila jogged 12 kilometers today and wants to know how far she traveled in feet. what error did sila make while converting from kilometers to feet?
StartFraction 12 kilometers Over 1 EndFraction times StartFraction 0.62 miles Over 1 kilometer EndFraction times StartFraction 5280 feet Over 1 mile EndFraction = 392,832 feet
sila put a wrong number in her calculator when multiplying the numerators.
1 km sila's first fraction should be 0 62 mi 1 mi
sila's last fraction should be 5280 ft
sila forgot to divide by 0 62 asap
(12kilometers / 1 ) × (0.62 miles / 1 kilometer) × 5280 / 1 mile
12 kilometers = 39,370.079 feet
1 kilometer = 0.621 miles
sila put a wrong number in her calculator when multiplying the numerators
Answer:
Judges could reverse a trial verdict
Step-by-step explanation:
The appellate court will do one of the following:
Affirm the decision of the trial court, in which case the verdict at trial stands.
Reverse the decision to the trial court, in which case a new trial may be ordered.
Remand the case to the trial court.
It is irrational. Otherwise sqrt(2) would be rational too which is not true.
