Answer:
dang...
Explanation:
well, don't worry. I don't copy and paste c.ra.p everywhere-
I agree, spamming is definitely not the right way to protest since peaceful people just trying to get help on their work are being affected by this.
may I have Brainliest? I'm stuck on Expert ( ╯︿╰ )
Answer: How is the rule of law related to the protection of human rights?
The rule of law, based on human rights, underpins peace and security. ... The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: “If man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression […] human rights should be protected by the rule of law.”
According to data, it is found that juveniles do not sufficiently understand the Miranda warning and find it difficult to exercise their right of remaining silent.
<h3><u>Explanation:
</u></h3>
Juveniles are far more sensitive than adults are. This is the reason what may not mean coercion in the case of an adult may be considered as coercion in the case having a juvenile involved. According to the data obtained from a number of juvenile justice cases, it is clear that the juveniles do not choose to make use of their right to remain silent.
This may be either because they don't properly come to terms with what Miranda rights actually are or they are too vulnerable to the interrogation and can't resist speaking out of fear.
Number. B a condital fee agreement legislation aid and own funds
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Declarations against interest are an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that he would not have made the statement unless he believed the statement was true.
And statements are usually made in court.
Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarant’s Unavailability. A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.
is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because of the court rules
