Answer: quoting.
The best method for incorporating evidence in this case would be quoting. This is because the original text is easily accessible, and because, if the reader were to question your argument, he would be able to easily compare your analysis with the text. Moreover, your claim refers to the use of language in the book, which does not require secondary sources in order to be interpreted.
Romanticism is a form of art and literature that doesn't happen in real life. On the other hand, Realism is a form art and literature that tries to mimic real life.
<h3>What is Romanticism and Realism about?</h3>
Romanticism was an artistic, literary, musical, and intellectual movement that began in Europe near the end of the 18th century and peaked in most areas between 1800 and 1850. The individual, the subjective, the irrational, the imaginative, the personal, the spontaneous, the emotional, the visionary, and the transcendental were all emphasized in Romanticism. Travel back in time to the turn of the nineteenth century to witness the Romantic musical, literary, and artistic movement.
In the arts, realism is generally defined as the attempt to represent subject matter truthfully, without artificiality, and without speculative or supernatural elements. Although these terms are not synonymous, they are frequently used interchangeably. Realism is the belief that things that are known or perceived have an existence or nature that is independent of whether anyone is thinking about or perceiving them.
Learn more Romanticism on:
brainly.com/question/1103190
#SPJ1
Which topic is most related to the theme of <u>conservation</u> in green literature?
Answer:
C. Water resources
Explanation:
Green literature deals with environmental themes. As <u>conservation</u> means <em>prevention of wasteful use of a resource, </em>the correct choice would be C.
Answer and Explanation:
In "Flowers for Algernon," the main character is Charlie Gordon, a man who undergoes surgery to improve his intelligence. Before the procedure, Charlie's I.Q. was 68. At a certain point in the story, three different doctors try to explain to Charlie what I.Q. is, but they have different opinions on the matter.
<u>Dr. Nemur says the I.Q. of a person shows how smart that person is. Dr. Strauss, on the other hand, claims that Dr. Nemur is wrong, and that an I.Q. shows how smart a person can get. That it is like the numbers written on a measuring cup - we still need to fill the cup with something. Confused, Charlie talks to Dr. Burt, who says the other two doctors could be wrong. According to Burt, I.Q. can measure several different things, including things a person has already learned, but it is not a good measure for intelligence.</u>
