Social comparison
hope that helps!
Answer:
А
. They take on very little risk in starting a business due to government control.
Explanation:
<u>Entrepreneurs are people who start individual businesses based on the existing economy, with the idea to gain profit. </u>These businesses are usually innovative and creative, and the entrepreneurs are deciding themselves on the resources, projects, processes, and products of the business.
The businesses that entrepreneurs take on <u>are not government-supported. </u><u>They usually fund the project themselves (or crowdfunding in some instances), which means they </u><u>take quite a bit of risk</u><u>. </u>At the start of business development, there is no guarantee the business will take on and succeed, and that they will end up making a profit, <u>so there is always great risk entrepreneurs take when investing money in starting the new work.</u>
Douglas's project is working from a structural model<span> of cognitive psychology.
In ,</span>structural model of cognitive psychology, we only analyze <span>a single cognitive phenomenon or process (such as making decision, learning, fight or flight) etc.
By mapping each brain for its specific function, i believe Douglass' project is really close to this model.</span>
Answer:
Chronic stress
Explanation:
Stress is happened because of biological changes and environmental changes in the lives of people. Due to stress body release cortisol and adrenaline hormone. These are hormones help to understand make heart rate high and pulse rate becomes high. These symptoms indicate that the person is in a high alert state. Physical stress or symptoms are not so long in stress. Many factors can indicate stress.
<u>Symptoms of stress:
</u>
- High-pressure job
- High-pressure work
- High-pressure family responsibilities
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
