This is a little open for interpretation, but I would generally say that the best answer is that Josip Broz Tito was a very powerful leader, who kept the republics and the different groups together.
For example, we can see this from the fact that the first conflict happened in 1981: one year after his death ( a protest of Kosovans who demanded autonomy).
Above average effect is the cause of this.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The tendency of any person to consider the favourable views related to their own social abilities and intellectual abilities that are related to others refers to an above average effect. The view that society holds on an individual plays an important role in making the person to feel about himself. It has greater impacts on the behaviour of the persons too. When society has a positive view on an individual then he will be having positive behaviour towards them. People usually think about the thief and the people who do crime related things to be less kind, morality, and honesty and trust worthiness. This makes the people associated with these activities to think themselves to be higher than the average community member in terms of morality, kindness, generosity, trustworthiness, and honesty. Above average effect is the cause of this.
Answer: The correct answer is : All of the above
Explanation: The term "performance" has recently grown in usage when referring to a broad spectrum of activities in the arts, literature, social science, and beyond. Richard Schechner is a theater director, performance theorist and university professor, is one of the founders of the academic discipline of Performance Studies at the Tisch School of the Arts at New York University.
Answer:
Social determinants” refer to broader social factors, such as income inequality or social exclusion, that lead to or influence health and development outcomes. In Section 4 of this chapter, for instance, a development worker in Mexico tells of realizing that one of the major causes of malnutrition in the area where he was working was not that there simply wasn’t enough food. Sharecropping farmers were able to grow enough to feed their families, but had to borrow seed from the landowner to plant their crops. The terms of the loan were that, for every liter of maize borrowed at planting time, three liters had to be repaid from the harvest. With this high interest rate, peasants went deeper and deeper into debt, and had to use more of their crop each year to pay the landowner. Without power, group solidarity, and influence, the farmers were unable to create conditions that assured the health and well-being of their families.