-The firs way is by giving advice to the Congress.
Federal agency consist of several departments that possess various expertise that hold the country together. So listening their advice would give the congress different perspectives on what best for the country.
- Since every complain from the citizens are directed to the federal bureaucracy, they possess the data that represent the interest of the majority citizens.
Chinese religions draw on the grounds of Buddhism and paganism.I believe the answer point to the observance to the nature of how Gods and Goddesses influence one's life.
Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
Answer:
MERIWETHER LEWIS was the full name of the man who was in charge of the lewis and clark expedition and WILLIAM CLARK was the full name of his fellow explorer. M. Lewis was a captain
Clark was a lieutenant.
The Lewis and Clark Expedition began in 1804, when President Thomas Jefferson tasked Meriwether Lewis with exploring lands west of the Mississippi River that comprised the Louisiana Purchase. Lewis chose William Clark as his co-leader for the mission. The excursion lasted over two years: Along the way they confronted harsh weather, unforgiving terrain, treacherous waters, injuries, starvation, disease and both friendly and hostile Native Americans. Nevertheless, the approximately 8,000-mile journey was deemed a huge success and provided new geographic, ecological and social information about previously uncharted areas of North America
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
The only purpose of it being white, is for camouflage against the snow.
