Answer: B.
Explanation: Option D is discarded because the sentence clearly needs to have its punctuation fixed; option C is wrong because the independent clause "it was unbelievable..." cannot be introduced with a comma, and while options A and B seem viable, the abrupt interruption of the normal flow of the sentence demands the use of dashes.
One aspect of the article that was not discussed in detail was What Hector thinks about her opponents.
<h3>What did the article on Hector speak on?</h3>
We found out about the reason why some opponents don't support Hector which was that she was young.
We also found out how she had impacted her community. We did not however find out what she thought of her opponents because the article focused on her reasons for running.
Find out more on analyzing articles at brainly.com/question/1542515.
#SPJ1
In line 1, the phrase "an antique land" means a land....."With long history". Lines 4 and 5 most strongly suggest that Ozymandias was<span>Arrogant.
</span>
The author should use 1st person when speaking AS the character. 3rd person is when speaking FOR the characters, like, " Mary and Lynne ran across the field. "
C- it would be bias for answer A , many high school student don't have a personal trainer as well as blog posts are not reliable, and parents do not have experience the direct impact . Those are all the reason it can't be any of the others.
