Answer: a way to solve disputes between countries before they erupted into open warfare.
Explanation: a way to keep piece before war
Answer:
constitutional right is diffrent I think
Answer:
According to the Second Amendment, all US citzens were allowed to bear and keep arms. It is not clear whether that provided the right to individual self-defense or to state militias.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment of the Constitution that was adopted in 1791 was meant to provide a check on congressional power and the federal government under Article I Section 8. This is the section of the Amendment that addresses the rights of the individual to organize, arm and discipline the federal militia. This amendment is controversial in modern society today because some people interpret it as the Constitutional defense for an individual to bear arms. It is an important part of the controversy over gun control in the United States.
There is some disagreement about the extent to which this right was applicable because the Second Amendment reads "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." There are therefore some who say that the right to bear arms is only in the context of militias needed to defend the rights of the state.
Answer:
the Indian Removal Act
Explanation:
The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.
Answer:
They may base events from history on periods of time using a certain theme, so to say. This way, it allows them to organize information in a chronological order and base events on how severe they were and what led up to the most significant event in that time period, because a turning point is basically the most important part in a time period which initiated change. This also emphasizes on the importance of transitions.
