Answer:
y=2x
y=-x
d=0
Step-by-step explanation:
sorry iam not sure i just tray to help
For this case we have the following functions:
If we want 
then:
We take common factor x:
Thus, the values of x that make equality equal are:
Thus, the values of x for whichare 0 and 2.
ANswer:
The values of x for which are 0 and 2.
For this case, the first thing to do is find the equation of the line correctly and then see which of the inequalities represents the shaded region.
We have then:
5x - y = 2
For x = 0
5 (0) - y = 2
-y = 2
y = -2
For y = 0
5x - 0 = 2
5x = 2
x = 2/5 = 0.4
Therefore the line is:
5x - y = 2
Then, we see that for the point (0, 0)
5x - y ≥ 2
5 (0) - (0) ≥ 2
0 ≥ 2
The inequality is not met, which is correct because this point is not part of the shaded region.
Answer:
The inequality that best is represented by the graph if:
5x - y ≥ 2
Answer:
I would agree with your answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Though it's kind of comparing apples to oranges as the basis is unclear
I'm ASSUMING both investments occurred during the same time period.
The first one appears to have a ROI of 305/800 = 0.38125
The second one is much muddier
If the investment is cashed out to zero and the total return to you is $900, then the ROI is (900 - 650) / 650 = 0.3846153. This is better than the first return, but just a little bit.
However, if the investment has not been cashed out and your $650 is actually still working and you have received $900 in interest or dividends, then the ROI is 900/650 = 1.384615... which is more than 3.6 times greater return than the first option.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the probablility, add all of the possibilities. Then, divide the outcome by the total possibilities.
x+3x+5x+4x=13x
x/13x=1/13.
So, the probabilit is 1/13.
