Answer:
True
Explanation:
yes it is true that you should ask the taxpayer if they had any other interest income to avoid double taxation elsewhere
Explanation:
The retained earnings are calculated by adding net income to (or subtracting net losses from) the previous term's retained earnings and then subtracting any net dividend(s) paid to the shareholders. The figure is calculated at the end of each accounting period (quarterly/annually.)
Hope it helped u if yes mark me BRAINLIEST
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
<span>If the Fed expands the money supply by $1
trillion, the money market will be (letter C.) the equilibrium interest rate
will fall, and more money will exchanged in equilibrium. It is because people
will have more money to spend. Some would choose to use this money to buy goods
and services while other opt to put their money in banks which may lead to
lower interest rates to persuade people in borrowing. </span>
This is an illegal question. You may ask about a person's convictions for drug related charges, but you should not ask about treatment. This could also be classified as a needless question, but mostly illegal.
