All categories

3 years ago

This doesn’t make sense explain plz

Mathematics

1 answer:

AnnZ [28]3 years ago

5 0

Its simple, graph them.

For the first equation, go on the Y-Axis (the vertical one) and go to 4. Then from there go up 1, right 6.

For the second equation go on the Y-Axis (the vertical one) and plot a point at 1 (aka 0,1) Now you go up 1, right 3.

When you see an equation like y=2x+3, the 3 represents the point (0,3) as when the x is 0, y=3. Just plug the numbers in. And as for the "2x" 2 is the slope. Slope is always rise/run or up, then right. So if its 2 your slope is 2/1, rise 2, over 1. If it "-2x" is your slope then all you have to do is go down 2, right 1.

I hope this cleared up your confusion, brainliest/heart would help.

You might be interested in

9th out of 10 questions

77julia77 [94]

The last model,

It represents 8/10 or 4/5 which is greater than 3/5

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

CD is a perpendicular bisector of . Which of the following could be the slopes of the two lines if plotted on a coordinate grid?

NISA [10]

Step-by-step explanation:

A is the correct answer of this question

8 0

3 years ago

When jack went to the movie he paid $8 for his popcorn and $4 for each additional order of popcorn. if i represents the total co

melamori03 [73]

I = 8 + 4x

XD That's expensive popcorn!

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What function equation is represented by the graph? f(x)=14x+3 f(x)=−4x−3 f(x)=−14x−3 f(x)=14x−3

Vladimir [108]

See the explanation

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

Remember you have to provide complete questions in order to get exact answers. Here I'll provide a general explanation, so:

<h3>First.</h3>

$f(x)=14x+3$

The slope is:

$m=14$

The y-intercept is:

$b=3$

By using graphing tool, we get the first graph shown below.

<h3>Second.</h3>

$f(x)=-4x-3$

The slope is:

$m=-4$

The y-intercept is:

$b=-3$

By using graphing tool, we get the second graph shown below.

<h3>Third.</h3>

$f(x)=-14x-3$

The slope is:

$m=-14$

The y-intercept is:

$b=-3$

By using graphing tool, we get the third graph shown below.

<h3>Fourth.</h3>

$f(x)=14x-3$

The slope is:

$m=14$

The y-intercept is:

$b=-3$

By using graphing tool, we get the fourth graph shown below.

<h2>Learn more:</h2>

Linear inequalities: brainly.com/question/12984296

#LearnWithBrainly

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter o

tester [92]

Answer:

Part 1) The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor (see the explanation)

Part 2) The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures (see the explanation)

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its perimeters is equal to the scale factor

The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor

Part 2) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the area of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its areas is equal to the scale factor squared

The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) What would happen to the perimeter and area of a figure if the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally? For example, if the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the width did not change? Or if the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?

we know that

If the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally, then the ratio of the corresponding sides of the new figure and the original figure are not proportional

That means

The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures

therefore

Corresponding sides are not proportional and corresponding angles are not congruent

<u><em>A) If the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the width did not change?</em></u>

Perimeter

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2W ----> P=6L+2W

The perimeter of the new figure is greater than the perimeter of the original figure but are not proportionals

Area

The original area is A=LW

The new area would be A=(3L)(W) ----> A=3LW

The area of the new figure is three times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

<u><em>B) If the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?</em></u>

Perimeter

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2(W/4) ----> P=6L+W/2

The perimeter of the new figure and the perimeter of the original figure are not proportionals

Area

The original area is A=LW

The new area would be A=(3L)(W/4) ----> A=(3/4)LW

The area of the new figure is three-fourth times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

5 0

3 years ago