Question

The writer is considering changing the passage to argue that tyler does not have enough evidence to support the assertion that da vinci had exotropia. The writer drafted the following thesis statement, which is intended to preview the line of reasoning the new passage would have. Though it is true that tyler studied six separate works of art, including such famous works as vitruvian man and salvator mundi, there is not enough evidence to prove that da vinci suffered from exotropia. Should the writer include the underlined portion of the thesis statement?.

Answer 1

There are different assertion that Da Vinci had exotropia. The answer is that No, because a thesis does not need to provide specifics of an argument or evidence to be a good preview.

What is Exotropia

• Exotropia is often regarded as a medical condition where there is an outward turning of the human eyes. Studies has shown that Da Vinci had exotropia and this was one of the key reasons that made him unique.

People who have this condition often have their vision mostly blurry or they can have double vision when their eye are facing outward.  

In the above, the statement is showing that thesis does not need to give any kind of  argument or evidence for it to be regarded as a good preview.

The options to the question is below

Should the writer include the underlined portion of the thesis statement?

A Yes, because it helps remind readers of some famous da Vinci works.

B Yes, because it strengthens the thesis by conceding that the works Tyler studied are important ones.

C Yes, since it suggests that the writer is knowledgeable on the subject of da Vinci.

D No, because a thesis does not need to provide specifics of an argument or evidence to be a good preview.

E No, since it specifies what Tyler’s study included rather than what it failed to include.

Learn more about this passage from

brainly.com/question/19923873