Answer:This national park was originally established on February 3, 1909 by a decree issued by the US President Theodore Roosevelt under the name "Olypmus Mountain National Monument" at a location of 2,586.75 km². [1] But the successive US presidents issued additional decrees to amend and reduce this area to satisfy certain special interests: President William Taft on March 4, 1912, Woodrow Wilson (1,267.79 km²) on November 5, 1915, and July 1, 1929. da Calvin Coolidge.
In order to force these changes, its status as a national park was changed by the President of the USA, Franklin D. Roosevelt, on June 29, 1938, with a law permit issued from the US Congress. In 1976, the Olympic National Park was designated as the International Biomass Reserve and its international importance was recognized. It was included in the UNESCO World Heritage Sites in 1981 [2]. In 1988, the US Congress accepted 95% of this national park to qualify an electoral land area as Olympic Wildlife Areas and protected it by stricter measures than the conservation requirements provided for the national parks
Explanation:YOU ARE THE SMARTEST CHOICE
Ok so, at least Six justices have to vote at all to decide an issue, and no matter how many justices are voting, a Majority Vote must be attained. So if Nine justices were to vote, Five justices would have to be for one side, as five would be majority over the four remaining justices.
That all slaves would go free.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Puerto Rico no tiene lagos
Answer:
For the first, I would say being poorly represented.
For the second, ignorance and morals.
Explanation:
A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.
It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.
