Answer:
B. creating figures and settings with an increased naturalism
Explanation:
Duccio was a extraordinary painter born in Siena and Giotto was originally from Vicchio, both of them were born at the end of the 13th century. Both Duccio and Giotto belonged to the period that some historians refer to as the "Proto- Renaissance" period as far as art is concerned. These two artists deeply explored the psychological aspects in their works and this was reflected in the great naturalness they expressed in their paintings, the religious images of both artists also reflected and expressed with their strokes the personality and intelligence of those characters considered sacred in religion such is the case of angels.
Answer:
Family responsibility discrimination
Explanation:
Family responsibility discrimination is a discrimination shown to any employee of an organisation based on the responsibilities shown by the employee towards his family.
It is also known as caregiver discrimination. It is discrimination shown against an employee for the family care giving responsibilities.
Almost all the employee is or will be a care giver to their family. They include pregnant women, fathers, mothers, persons who have sick or ageing parents or sick children or spouse, etc. All of them can be targeted for care giving discrimination at the organisations.
Theses employees can be demoted, harassed or even terminated.
Thus the law which supports the employee's claim is ---
Family responsibility discrimination
No, it's like a massive prison. If you attempt to leave, you will be publicly executed.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Argue a case for appointing judges and then argue a case for having them elected.
In the case of appointing judges, many experts agree on the idea that appointed is better because judges have to be neutral. They serve the Constitution, they do not serve any political party or particular interests.
Once appointed, the judges are going to ratify, so it is supposed that their integrity is double-checked.
In other cases, some arguments favor the election of judges, stating that people should be trusted to elect judges. Through this election, judges will be driven to serve the people who put their trust in them to impart justice.
If they are elected, some voices agree that judges should be elected for a determined period, so people could evaluate if they did a good during their tenure.
However, in both cases, some advantages and disadvantages have to be resolved by law experts and politicians in their respective states.
