The fact that people who watch a lot of violent TV are also more likely to be aggressive does not in itself proof a cause-effect relationship. That is, there is no evidence that one situation is a cause and the other one is a consequence (causation). It only proves that both characteristics are present together (correlation).
This could be a case of “spurious correlation,” which implies that two characteristics are often present together because there is a third factor that influences both of them.
For example, if we assume that this case refers to minors, it could be that minors who watch a lot of violent TV are neglected by their parents. Additionally, it could be that children who behave aggressively are also neglected by their parents. If that were the case, then being neglected would be a more likely predictor of violent behaviour, as opposed to watching violent TV.
In order to make sure there is a cause-effect relationship, we would need to perform an experiment where all other factors are controlled.
Answer:
Pop-out.
Explanation:
The ability to detect an object amongst distractor objects in situations in which the number of distractors presented is unimportant is called the <em>pop-out</em> ability. This ability occurs when an object is clearly identified among distractors. An object pops-out noticeably from the other objects. This is also called the pop-out phenomenon.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The resource management task that includes activating local resource requirements is referred to as 'mobilization'.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In order to commence the process of fetching requirements from the players at the local level, the key is to mobilize certain elements to put them into place together so that it forms a complex setup capable of generating the required resources.
- Hence, it can be said that the action of mobilization serves the purpose of initiating the flow of resource requirement.
The answer is "Avoiding relational stage".
When we move toward the avoiding stage, it might be an approach to end the ponderousness that accompanies stagnation, as individuals flag that they need to shut down the lines of communication. Communication in this stage can be direct or very indirect.
