What can be logically concluded about each option:
- <u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
- <u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
- <u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
- <em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
Answer:
With good word choice the author is able to create a mental picture for the reader, whether it's vivid adjectives or constant use of descriptive verbs.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
D. Because media is the photos and videos that are saved.
Answer:
this proves that, instead, the answer to that is, and i will finish by saying
Explanation:
Thank you to the person who answered first!
