I’d say sea floor but do correct me if I’m wrong
He will succeed at what he is doing
<h2> Children & Voting</h2>
Consequences and both negative and positive sides
I think children should not be allowed to vote for things such as presidents, since it's a big responsibility. But I do think, early teens and teenagers (12+) should be smart enough to elect a candidate, and predict the consequences of their election.
If I vote for a person with a dirty history, I should predict there is no reason why he/she should suddenly be a clean person.
If I vote for a person with a clean history, but that doesn't seem to be willing to do or change anything, I should be able to predict that things will remain the same, if not worse.
Even if most children that age, are responsible enough to vote, it's a huge responsibility, and the truth is, newer generations are gradually loosing interest in politics, which means they will relatively become more politically naive, affecting their decisions.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
Scientific misconducts are an infringement of the ethical codes. In the given scenario the negligence of the cited source in the data is misconduct.
<h3>What is cited source?</h3>
Cited sources are the references of the data taken from the other places and websites that are included in your content as an image, text, figures, statements, etc.
The text or the data used from other sources must be cited by including the name of the authors from the authentic source followed by the author from the secondary reference.
Therefore, the negligence of the cited source is a type of scientific misconduct.
Learn more about scientific misconduct here:
brainly.com/question/21502129
#SPJ1
