The sentence that has faulty parallel structure is option A
The trip started in Colorado, went through New Mexico, and the the end being California.
Faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form. It does not follow the same grammatical pattern according verb tenses. The correct version would be and ended in Carlifornia
The first and the third sentences contain parallel structures. Parallel structure, or parallelism, is the repetition of the same grammatical structure or form within a sentence, so it becomes more balanced, and, therefore, more readable and clear to understand.
In the first sentence, the parallel structure has been used in the comparison: "... would make war <em>rather than let</em> the nation survive and accept war<em> rather than let</em> it perish..."
In the third sentence the same grammatical form has been used too: "<em>all dreaded it </em>(1) <em>all sought to</em> avert <em>it </em>(2)."
Usjdidnzownaid issss so sodneisnvd I can go get my nails e dbdjdjdn
It is true that any interpretation that can be defended with evidence from the text is a valid topic for a critical essay.
I think it’s D when a poem rhymes you can easily point out important words.