The difference in the goals of working-class parents and middle-class parents in rearing their children was found by melvin kohn and carmi schooler to bemost related to the degree of individual freedom the parents had in their jobs. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your desired help.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice "Scandivania"
They call it the Nordic Model.
Although there are significant differences among the Nordic countries, they all share some common traits. These include support for a "universalist" welfare state aimed specifically at enhancing individual autonomy and promoting social mobility<span>; a </span>corporatist<span> system involving a tripartite arrangement where representatives of labor and employers negotiate wages and labor market policy mediated by the government;</span><span>and a commitment to widespread </span>private ownership<span>, free markets and </span>free trade.
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
Answer:
Competent person.
Explanation:
As the exercise says, a competent person is one who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings, as well as unsanitary or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them.
=
