Answer:
Full question: <em>On their birthdays, employees at a large company are permitted to take a 60-minute lunch break instead of the usual 30 minutes. Data were obtained from 10 randomly selected company employees on the amount of time that each actually took for lunch on his or her birthday. The company wishes to investigate whether these data provide convincing evidence that the mean time is greater than 60 minutes. Of the following, which information would NOT be expected to be a part of the process of correctly conducting a hypothesis test to investigate the question, at the 0.05 level of significance?</em>
<em>Answe</em><em>r: Since that the p-value is greater than 0.05, rejecting the null hypothesis and concluding that the mean time was not greater than 60 minutes. </em>
Explanation:
<em>From the given question let us recall the following statements:</em>
<em>Employees at a large company are permitted to take a 60-minute Lunch break instead of the 30 minutes.</em>
<em>Data was gotten from = 10 randomly selected company employees on the amount of time that each actually took for lunch on his or her birthday</em>
<em>Given that the p-value is greater than 0.05, rejecting the null hypothesis and concluding that the mean time was not greater than 60 minutes.</em>
<em>The company tries to investigate the data to know that the mean is greater than 60 minutes</em>
<em>the next step is to find the process of correctly conducting a hypothesis test to investigate the question, at the 0.05 level of significance</em>
<em>Therefore,</em>
<em>Since that the p-value is greater than 0.05, rejecting the null hypothesis and concluding that the mean time was not greater than 60 minutes. </em>
<em>Or</em>
<em>The P-value> 0.05</em>
<em>The mean time is not greater than 60 minutes</em>
Answer:
A) increase by $1,200 is the correct option
Explanation:
Incremental savings [500 *26] =13000
Rental income=2,200
Total income=15200
Less:Incremental cost =[500*28] =- 14000
Incremental income 1200
Answer:
C) 19000 (3000) 34000
Explanation:
income: 50,000
salaries (80,000) (sum of partner salaries)
interest <u> (10,000) </u> (total capital 100,000 x 10% interest )
net loss (40,000)
<u>Partner A</u>
50,000 + 30,000 salary + 5,000 interest - 16,000 loss share(40%) = 69,000
It woulld be allocate: 69,000 - 50,000 = 19,000
<u>Partner B</u>
30,000 + 10,000 salary + 3,000 interest - 16,000 loss share(40%) = 27,000
27,000 - 30,000 = -3,000
<u>Partner C</u>
20,000 + 40,000 salary + 2,000 interest - 8,000 loss share(20%) = 54,000
54,000 - 20,000 = 34,000
C, the month you’re born has noting to do with it and the done really pay attention to where you live!
<span>The answer for this question is b. False. The first scientific approach established by Heinrich is focus on Prevention and is a linear approach that looks like a Domino effect. His model starts with the possible mistakes and according to this model by eliminating one of the factor (mistakes or possible causes of accident) an accident can be prevented. Today this model is called Domino theory. Heinrich established this model and called it Scientific Approach for Accident Prevention.</span>
