Answer:
$6,900
Explanation:
When you use the incremental cost allocation method, you must rank cost activities and how they will be allocated. In this case, department 2 is the primary user, and therefore, rental costs must be allocated first to them. Rental costs will be allocated at a $25/hour rate.
Since department 1 is the next user, 100 hours will be allocated using the same rate as department 2, but the next 200 hours will be allocated at the lower $22/hour rate. Total rental cost allocation to department 1 = (100 x $25) + (200 x $22) = $2,500 + $4,400 = $6,900
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": industry-wide differentiation strategy.
Explanation:
An industry-wide differentiation strategy aims to broaden the scope of a business that is specially dedicated to the retail of products of a certain industry. The company keeps focusing on the same industry but supplying more related products consumers their typical consumers are likely to purchase. Part of the strategy implies reaching new markets, thus, investment in new locations might be necessary.
<span>A fast-food restaurant decides to raise the price of its hamburgers. assume the firm is in a monopolistically competitive industry. what will happen to the demand for its hamburgers? When the fast-food restaurant raises the price of hamburgers, some customers may stay and pay the higher price because they want that specific brand of hamburgers, other may go elsewhere to find them cheaper.
When prices raise, some customers stay because they are attached to that specific company, others leave because they want a burger but for a lower price.
</span>
Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed
Answer:
D. continuous review system
Explanation:
In the context of manufacturing it seems that the system being described would be a continuous review system. Like mentioned in the question this is a system that automatically adjusts the stock level in real time when a product moves in or out of stock, and automatically triggers an order for more stock as soon as the stock level hits a low quantity point is hit.
