All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is a potential safety hazard?

Business

2 answers:

Marysya12 [62]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Potential Safety Hazard is the most well-known one and will be available in many working environments one after another or another. It incorporates dangerous conditions that can cause injury, sickness and demise.

Potential Safety Hazard is comprehensive of:

Spills on floors or stumbling dangers, for example, blocked walkways or lines stumbling into the floor
Working from statures, including stepping stools, frameworks, rooftops, or any raised work region
Unguarded hardware and moving apparatus parts; watches evacuated or moving parts that a laborer can unintentionally contact
Electrical perils like frayed ropes, missing ground pins, inappropriate wiring
Bound spaces
Hardware related perils (lockout/tag out, evaporator security, forklifts, and so forth

Explanation:

Potential Safety Hazards are dangerous working conditions that that can cause injury, disease, and passing. Safety hazards are the most widely recognized working environment dangers.

They include:

Anything that can cause spills or excursions, for example, ropes stumbling into the floor or ice

Anything that can cause falls, for example, working from statures, including stepping stools, platforms, rooftops, or any raised work zone.
Unguarded and moving hardware parts that a laborer can incidentally contact.

Electrical perils like frayed strings, missing ground pins, and inappropriate wiring
Limited spaces.

butalik [34]3 years ago

4 0

Please provide a proper information to answer this question

You might be interested in

Exercise 8-9 Colaw Stores accepts both its own and national credit cards. During the year, the following selected summary transa

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

The Journal entries with their narration is given below:-

Explanation:

The Journal entry is shown below:-

1. Account receivables Dr, $22,200

To Sales $22,200

(Being sales is recorded)

2. Cash Dr, $6,048

Service charge expense Dr, $252

($6,300 × 4%)

To Sales $6,300

(Being credit card sales is recorded)

3. Cash Dr, $11,600

To accounts receivable $11,600

(Being cash is recorded)

4. Accounts receivable Dr, $364

($22,000 - $11,600) × 3.5%

To Interest revenue $364

(Being finance charges is recorded)

5 0

2 years ago

Which is the best way to avoid market risks?

hjlf

Not trying to sale to the wrong company or risking on a single product of some sort.

3 0

3 years ago

To find all mentions of your competitor's branded hashtag within a given radius of a store you've opened up in a new city, you s

Alenkasestr [34]

<span>To find all mentions of your competitor's branded hashtag within a given radius of a store you've opened up in a new city, you should set up a geo-search stream. When you set up the geo-search stream, have it filter the hashtag and the desired radios around the stores you wish to track. Tracking this will allow the company to have more insights on their competitors. </span>

3 0

3 years ago

In the recent past, the government has attempted to stimulate the economy by sending tax refunds to individual people so that th

blondinia [14]

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question will be "Consumption".

Explanation:

Investments, welfare spending, consumer spending are essential elements of GDP. That tells them what a nation is doing well. For every year, GDP is the world's total economic production.

Expenditure on resources consumption includes:

Durable goods (Furniture, cars, etc).
Non-durable goods (Oils. clothing, etc).
Services (Education, health, etc).

Therefore, it's the right answer.

3 0

3 years ago

LeMay Department Store uses the retail inventory method to estimate ending inventory for its monthly financial statements. The f

Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

Cost to retail ratio = 57.05%

Explanation:

Particulars Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $46,000 $66,000

Add: Purchases $213,000 $406,000

Less: Purchases Return $7,000 $9,000

Freight In $15,558 -

Net Markups - $6,400

Good Avail. for Sales (Without markdowns) $267,558 $469,000

Cost to retail ratio = $267,558/$469,000

Cost to retail ratio = 0.570486

Cost to retail ratio = 57.05%

6 0

3 years ago