Yes, Rubio will be able to successfully sue and collect the $1,000 later because their agreement was not fulfilled.
<h3>What is an agreement in contract?</h3>
In contract, an agreement is an element of what makes a contract valid. When an agreement is breached, then, the aggrieved party have a right to void the contract.
In conclusion, the answer is yes because Rubio will be able to successfully sue and collect the $1,000 later because their agreement was not fulfilled.
Read more about agreement
<em>brainly.com/question/997952</em>
Answer:
The expected return = 10.739.
Explanation:
Given risk-free rate of return = 2.3 per cent
Market expected return = 12 percent
The value of beta = 0.87
Use the below formula to find the expected return.
The expected return = Risk free rate of return + Beta × (Market expected return - risk free rate of return)
The expected return = 2.3 + 0.87 (12 – 2.3)
The expected return = 10.739
Answer:
Apportioned joint cost to A=$92,800
Explanation:
<em>Joint costs are the costs incurred up until the split-off where two or more products result from the same production process. These common costs need to be apportioned among the joint products using any of the following basis:</em>
- physical units
- Relative sales value basis.
The relative value basis apportions joint costs using the proportion of product individual sales value to the the total sales value.
Total sales value = (280×4,000) + (100×2,800) =1400000
Apportioned joint cost to A =(1,120,000/1,400,000)× 116,000=92800
Apportioned joint cost to A=$92,800
Answer:
Increase by $37,100.
It will accept any time the price is above $43 with the condition it will not incur in additional fixed cost.
$63. is the sales price that generates 106,000 dollar of operating income
Explanation:
As the units will not inccur in any additional fixed cost we should check for the contribution margin this units will provide:
50 dollars - 43 dollar of variable cost = 7 dollars
5,300 saws x $7 = 37,100
The sales reveues will increase by that amount.
(5,300 x $43 dollars each in cost + 106,000 contribution )/5,300 = sales price
sales price = 63
Answer:
No, the cost of the annual premium for 10 years was less than the accident claims
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the annual premium is $1,200, $200,000 is the bodily injury coverage and $100,000 should be the property damage coverage
Also the $40,000 and $20,000 represent the medical cost and the car damage
So here the cost should not outweight the benefit of the transferring the risk as the annual premium cost for ten years should be lower than the accident claims
