Answer: AGREE
Explanation:
A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.
They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.
A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.
The statement above is true. When using interval method, it does not matter the number of responses, if the behavior occur in a given segment then the observer has to record it as a single event. For instance, in an English class of one hour, that is divided into six segments of ten minutes each. It does not matter the number of responses, if the behaviour occurs within the segment of ten minutes, then it has to be recorded as a single event.
The general guideline for the segregation of duties is that the following areas should be separated by accounting controls : 1. custody of assets, 2. authorization of transactions, and 3. record-keeping responsibilities.
<h3>Give a brief account on segregation of duties.</h3>
The assignment of distinct steps in a process to different personnel is known as the segregation of duties. By exercising extreme control over a process, the goal is to prevent situations in which someone might steal something or do another fraud. In essence, distinct parties should have physical custody of an asset, record-keeping responsibilities for it, and acquisition and disposal authority.
A key component of a control system is the separation of roles. When evaluating an entity's system of internal controls, auditors will consider duty segregation and will give the system a lower rating if there are any segregation problems.
The auditors will change their methods when there are segregation problems because they will presume that the danger of fraud has increased. This method shift typically entails a rise in audit workload, which is passed on to the customer in the form of higher audit fees.
To know more about, segregation of duties, visit :
brainly.com/question/28289850
#SPJ4
Answer:
It is observed that the value of test statistics (19.168) is greater than the critical value (13.277), thus the rejected hypothesis, H₀ at α = 0.01.
There is enough evidence to conclude or deduce that sales were the same for all locations
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Object: Test whether the sales were the same for all locations by applying 1% significance level.
The Null Hypothesis H₀ : Sales were the same for all locations
E₁ = 70 +75 +70+ 50 + 35/5 = 60
The Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ : Sales were not the same for all locations
Now,
The decision rule:
the Level of Significance be α = 0.01
Degrees of freedom is df= Number of categories -1
=5-1 = 4
Note: Kindly find an attached copy of part of the work solution of this given question
