Answer:
I would agree more with Amos' opinion, thinking that most of the plant's energy ends up in the grasshopper.
Explanation:
In food chains, the flow of energy that occurs from one organism to another, from the producer to the tertiary or quaternary consumer. The amount of energy that can be transferred from one level to another is only 10%, with herbivorous animals taking up more of the energy that a producer has.
According to this, <em>it is logical to think like Amos, since the grasshopper -a primary or herbivorous consumer- will take advantage of more energy contained in the plant, with respect to the consumers of the higher levels</em>.
Learn more:
Energy and nutrients in an ecosystem brainly.com/question/8101088
False, as a mutations aren’t always negative to a person. Eg blue eyes is a mutation.
It is false that there is a single instrument to measure climate change.
As a matter of fact, there are so many, some of which are used in the air, some on the ground, some underwater - so it is definitely incorrect to say there is only one, because that is not true.
<span>The control group is as similar as possible to the experimental group except that it is not exposed to the independent variable. The independent variable is the variable the researchers manipulate to determine its effect on the dependent variable. The dependent variable is not changed. The other group is exposed to the independent variable.</span>
<span>When you get excited and your adrenaline starts pumping, your body is not experiencing evolution, so f</span>alse