Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
Answer:
1.freedom of mass media
2.free campaign
3.freedom of participation of citizen in election
Christianity is the correct anwser
Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
